Which practice is not recommended when using drive stun?

• A. Using the device as the primary means of control without attempting other de-escalation
• B. Touching bare skin with the front of the DFSG
• C. Monitoring the subject for injury and bleeding
• D. Providing medical care when necessary

Answer: (A)

Drive stun should be a last-resort option, not the primary means of gaining control. The idea is to prioritize de-escalation and only apply force when it’s necessary and proportionate to stay safe. Relying on the device as the main control tool can escalate the situation, increase the likelihood of harm, and lead to less safe outcomes.

Touching bare skin with the front of the DFSG is a standard way to deliver the drive-stun stimulus, used briefly and with attention to safety and target areas. It’s a direct contact method that aligns with how drive stun is meant to function when needed.

Monitoring the subject for injury and bleeding is essential after any force application, including drive stun, to detect harms early and respond appropriately.

Providing medical care when necessary is part of responsible response, ensuring any injuries or adverse effects are addressed promptly and properly.